From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Simek Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:58:47 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot panasonic repo In-Reply-To: <201409180927.35918.marex@denx.de> References: <20140911120912.6E08.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> <54112B64.5010104@monstr.eu> <20140911141800.6E18.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> <201409180927.35918.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <541A90B7.6010308@monstr.eu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/18/2014 09:27 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 07:18:00 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Hi Michal, > > Hi, > >> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:56:04 +0200 >> >> Michal Simek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200 >>>> >>>> Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we >>>>> don't have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of >>>>> patches flying around without any kind of central point for them. I'd >>>>> like to get your formal consent for starting this and if you agree, >>>>> I'd start sending PR to Albert once the repo is in place. >>>> >>>> Me too. I'd like to own u-boot-uniphier to collect >>>> Panasonic-SoC-specific changes. >>>> >>>> That would be faster and would not disturb Albert. >>> >>> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this. >>> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request >>> to Albert (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that. >> >> The point is that you collect Zynq-specific patches in your own place by >> yourself and then send a pull-req to Albert or Tom, right? >> >> It does not matter whether it is a separate u-boot-zynq repo or >> u-boot-microbraze/zynq branch. >> >> >> I have sent the first series to add the core support of Panasonic SoCs >> and boards (but it is taking much longer than I have expected) >> and then I am planning to send more features and boards in the next phase. >> >> >> What's the difference between what I want to do for Panasonic SoCs >> and what you usually do for Zynq SoCs? > > [...] > > I fully support that we should have a repo for the panasonic socs, it's > pointless to load Albert by making him apply patches by hand and you have > proven numerous times that you do know what you're doing. I really see no > blocker for doing this. +1 on this if Masahiro wants to have separate repo. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: