From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753343AbaIYNoR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:44:17 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:34877 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753094AbaIYNoN (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:44:13 -0400 Message-ID: <54241C0D.9020301@ti.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:43:41 -0400 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: "Nair, Sandeep" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "jhs@mojatatu.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] net: Add Keystone NetCP ethernet driver References: <20140915.123755.1868053059646672094.davem@davemloft.net> <54183EDB.20801@ti.com> <542320B3.9020902@ti.com> <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 September 2014 04:43 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Santosh Shilimkar > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:51:15 -0400 > >> Here is an updated version with above fixed. Not posting the entire >> series again since its just small update on the patch. > > That's not how this works. > > If you want your changes re-reviewed and considered for real inclusion, > you must repost the entire patch series from scratch, with a proper > list of what changes between the previous submission and the new one. Sure. Sending v4 right a way. Thanks Regards, Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] net: Add Keystone NetCP ethernet driver Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:43:41 -0400 Message-ID: <54241C0D.9020301@ti.com> References: <20140915.123755.1868053059646672094.davem@davemloft.net> <54183EDB.20801@ti.com> <542320B3.9020902@ti.com> <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Nair, Sandeep" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "jhs@mojatatu.com" To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 September 2014 04:43 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Santosh Shilimkar > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:51:15 -0400 > >> Here is an updated version with above fixed. Not posting the entire >> series again since its just small update on the patch. > > That's not how this works. > > If you want your changes re-reviewed and considered for real inclusion, > you must repost the entire patch series from scratch, with a proper > list of what changes between the previous submission and the new one. Sure. Sending v4 right a way. Thanks Regards, Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:43:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] net: Add Keystone NetCP ethernet driver In-Reply-To: <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140915.123755.1868053059646672094.davem@davemloft.net> <54183EDB.20801@ti.com> <542320B3.9020902@ti.com> <20140924.164306.431516399400992046.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <54241C0D.9020301@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 24 September 2014 04:43 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Santosh Shilimkar > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:51:15 -0400 > >> Here is an updated version with above fixed. Not posting the entire >> series again since its just small update on the patch. > > That's not how this works. > > If you want your changes re-reviewed and considered for real inclusion, > you must repost the entire patch series from scratch, with a proper > list of what changes between the previous submission and the new one. Sure. Sending v4 right a way. Thanks Regards, Santosh