From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leonardo Taccari Subject: Re: Xen ARM and rtds real-time scheduler: local_irq_is_enabled() assert Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: <542697a7.4355b40a.0443.ffffb7c1@mx.google.com> References: <54257008.aa15c20a.3c2f.3a11@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Content-ID: <2492.1411815847.1@foobar> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Meng Xu Cc: Meng Xu , Sisu Xi , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hello Meng, Meng Xu writes: > Could you please have a try: git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git, staging > branch and let me know if this problem still exist? > > I didn't test it on arm, but I think the difference between ARM and > Intel x86 should not make much difference in schedulers. Ok! I will try the staging branch in the next week and I will let you know (unfortunately I have access to the hardware only at university). Thank you! Ciao, L.