From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYa8L-0006gn-2B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:32:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYa8E-0003X2-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:32:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYa8E-0003WT-Mq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:32:46 -0400 Message-ID: <54295159.4090209@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:32:25 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1411721147-11712-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20140926162125.71ea6598.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF1902086DDC6DD@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <20140929125309.3b3483d0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140929125309.3b3483d0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND 0/9] virtio: fix virtio child recount in transports List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck , "Gonglei (Arei)" Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" , "mst@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "armbru@redhat.com" , Luonengjun , "agraf@suse.de" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , "borntraeger@de.ibm.com" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "rth@twiddle.net" Il 29/09/2014 12:53, Cornelia Huck ha scritto: > void virtio_instance_init_common(Object *proxydev, > DeviceState *vdev, > size_t vdevsize, > const char *vdevname) > { > object_initialize(vdev, vdevsize, vdevname); > object_property_add_child(proxydev, "virtio-backend", OBJECT(vdev), NULL); > object_unref(OBJECT(vdev)); > qdev_alias_all_properties(vdev, proxydev); > } > > and have the initializers call > > virtio_instance_init_common(obj, DEVICE(&dev->vdev), sizeof(dev->vdev), TYPE_WHATEVER); You cannot use DEVICE() here because dev->vdev has not been initialized yet. But virtio_instance_init_common could just take a void*. Paolo