From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF6C54EE9 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231392AbiIVTHp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230294AbiIVTHo (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:44 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B27F6860; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:07:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1663873664; x=1695409664; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8ZeyjYpqe72ewLlASmK/A6hGNqxbAV4/mf1Wzf7Awtc=; b=dNKarn6rl1DpBZxzAuyYnYDIfh38fObmwnmPbctTXNTL/IfhE+C6bZ2J GgSiv4jjjWIM0skiE61zAKiTwayj2gJX8fVnqmel2YiK3lubgElRBsu2F Xzrcw3MQu3D8HF6qPkZSZc1WBjA3H3RnnbqXCitYVv/7bGt4B6OHTLNJW zsvKG+QQ+ajeRTOUILOMBhgMX1AG/3GIEUVnVk9EqY91rfrmOQXRgjBN0 AvWQ8KOKywmoyaeXllL9wafb08c9Q3B2KR8OJ4+kUermb8x7DDbZlgu+P UepgbR0NI6QTgtqTIOjDlsTEP2szY/o3TEtopu03dC3+idC9+oZS6fGhi A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10478"; a="301839263" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,337,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="301839263" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2022 12:01:57 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,337,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="597569877" Received: from sponnura-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.58.200]) ([10.209.58.200]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2022 12:01:57 -0700 Message-ID: <54572271-d5ca-820f-911e-19fd9d80ae2c@intel.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:01:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait" workaround to old Intel systems Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Hansen , Len Brown , Mario Limonciello , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , K Prateek Nayak , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM References: <20220922184745.3252932-1-dave.hansen@intel.com> <78d13a19-2806-c8af-573e-7f2625edfab8@intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <78d13a19-2806-c8af-573e-7f2625edfab8@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 9/22/22 11:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > or do you want me to pick this up? I'll just stick it in x86/urgent. It's modifying code in a x86 #ifdef. I'll call it a small enclave of sovereign x86 territory in ACPI land, just like an embassy. ;)