From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] SELinux: The copy-up operation must have read permission on the lower file Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:43:21 -0500 Message-ID: <545A53A9.4060009@tycho.nsa.gov> References: <20141105154217.2555.578.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20141105154318.2555.7052.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov ([63.239.67.9]:56934 "EHLO emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754749AbaKEQqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:46:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141105154318.2555.7052.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells , linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/05/2014 10:43 AM, David Howells wrote: > The copy-up operation must have read permission on the lower file for the task > that caused the copy-up. This helps prevent overlayfs from being used to > access something it shouldn't. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells > --- > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c > index f43f07fdc028..57f9c641779f 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c > @@ -3144,7 +3144,8 @@ static void selinux_inode_getsecid(const struct inode *inode, u32 *secid) > > static int selinux_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct dentry *dst) > { > - return 0; > + const struct cred *cred = current_cred(); > + return dentry_has_perm(cred, src, FILE__OPEN | FILE__READ); > } Won't this get checked anyway when overlayfs calls vfs helpers to open the source and those vfs helpers call the security hooks and apply the usual checks? Or, if not, where do you check permissions for the destination?