Re: AW: ARCMSR - Notify sense data report - Lost patch?

[Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>]

On 11/24/2014 02:45 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
>> Von: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org [linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org]" im Auftrag von "Christoph Hellwig [hch@infradead.org]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2014 14:23
>> An: Markus Stockhausen
>> Cc: ching2048@areca.com.tw; thenzl@redhat.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> Betreff: Re: ARCMSR - Notify sense data report - Lost patch?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:47:02AM +0000, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sorting out some diffs between the official Arcea driver and
>>> the newest 3.18 patches I found a patch that might got lost:
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/20/956
>>>
>>> Could you check if that is desired?
>> Looks sensible to me.  Did you test it?
> No not really, as I don't know how. We had a controller crash the last
> week and I was wondering about the differences between vendor and
> upstream version. So I basically did some code comparison between 
> the two source. Besides a lot of layout differences and other hacks 
> this was one of the first things I noticed and wondered what difference 
> those flags could make. Especially regarding stability.
>
> Hopefully Ching and/or Tomas know better as they seem repsonsible 
> for the rest of the 3.18 arcmsr patches.

I don't know why Ching hasn't re-posted this in later series.
The Areca in-house driver works stable?

>
> Markus