From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Digimer Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [ha-wg-technical] [ha-wg] [Linux-HA] [RFC] Organizing HA Summit 2015 In-Reply-To: <54756A76.60905@fabbione.net> References: <540D853F.3090109@redhat.com> <20141124143957.GU2508@suse.de> <547346A9.6010901@redhat.com> <20141124151235.GX2508@suse.de> <54734BB5.3010104@redhat.com> <20141125095401.GG2522@suse.de> <54756A76.60905@fabbione.net> Message-ID: <54756EEC.7050905@alteeve.ca> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26/11/14 12:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > > > On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> On 2014-11-24T16:16:05, "Fabio M. Di Nitto" wrote: >> >>>> Yeah, well, devconf.cz is not such an interesting event for those who do >>>> not wear the fedora ;-) >>> That would be the perfect opportunity for you to convert users to Suse ;) >> >>>>> I?d prefer, at least for this round, to keep dates/location and explore >>>>> the option to allow people to join remotely. Afterall there are tons of >>>>> tools between google hangouts and others that would allow that. >>>> That is, in my experience, the absolute worst. It creates second class >>>> participants and is a PITA for everyone. >>> I agree, it is still a way for people to join in tho. >> >> I personally disagree. In my experience, one either does a face-to-face >> meeting, or a virtual one that puts everyone on the same footing. >> Mixing both works really badly unless the team already knows each >> other. >> >>>> I know that an in-person meeting is useful, but we have a large team in >>>> Beijing, the US, Tasmania (OK, one crazy guy), various countries in >>>> Europe etc. >>> Yes same here. No difference.. we have one crazy guy in Australia.. >> >> Yeah, but you're already bringing him for your personal conference. >> That's a bit different. ;-) >> >> OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we >> fill two days? Where would we want to collect them? > > I?d say either a google doc or any random etherpad/wiki instance will do > just fine. > > As for the topics: > - corosync qdevice and plugins (network, disk, integration with sdb?, > others?) > - corosync RRP / libknet integration/replacement > - fence autodetection/autoconfiguration > > For the user facing topics (that is if there are enough participants and > I only got 1 user confirmation so far): > > - demos, cluster 101, tutorials > - get feedback > - get feedback > - get more feedback > > Fabio Ok, I do have a topic I want to add; Merging the dozen different mailing lists, IRC channels and other support forums. This thread is a good example of the thinness that the community is spread over. A 'dev', 'user', 'announce' list should be enough for all HA. Likewise, one IRC channel should be enough, too. The trick will be discussing this without bikeshedding. :) digimer -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?