From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.37]:48124 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753787AbaLAR1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:27:07 -0500 Message-ID: <547CA4E7.8060209@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:27:03 -0800 From: Robert White MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MegaBrutal , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: PROBLEM: #89121 BTRFS mixes up mounted devices with their snapshots References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/01/2014 04:56 AM, MegaBrutal wrote: > Since the other thread went off into theoretical debates about UUIDs > and their generic relation to BTRFS, their everyday use cases, and the > philosophical meaning behind uniqueness of copies and UUIDs; I'd like > to specifically ask you to only post here about the ACTUAL problem at > hand. Don't get me wrong, I find the discussion in the other thread > really interesting, I'm following it, but it is only very remotely > related to the original issue, so please keep it there! If you're > interested to catch up about the actual bug symptoms, please read the > bug report linked above, and (optionally) reproduce the problem > yourself! That discussion _was_ the actual discussion of the actual problem. A problem that is not particularly theoretical, a problem that is common to block-level snapshots, and a discussion that contained the actual work-arounds. I suggest a re-read. 8-)