From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:44:56 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] Syntax fixes in contrib
In-Reply-To: <1417617210.29096.4.camel@joe.localdomain>
References: <1416983956-8770-1-git-send-email-jason@perfinion.com>	<547DDB5A.3000307@tresys.com>
	<20141202161542.GA16393@e145.network2>	<547ED76D.5010709@redhat.com>
	<1417617210.29096.4.camel@joe.localdomain>
Message-ID: <547F21E8.60002@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 12/3/2014 9:33 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 10:27 +0100, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> 
>>>>>
>>> The problem with the admin interfaces (any interfaces for that matter) is that unless they are called they aren't tested.
>>>
>>> This is also one of the reasons why i prefer only adding interfaces that are actually used.
>>>
>>> On that other hand, adding interfaces even if they aren't used does make sense for audit2allow/sepolgen-ifgen, and for the confined admin support
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
>> We have tests for testing these _admin() interfaces in RHEL. I believe
>> we could add them to Fedora to have them available.
> 
> Could be interesting. I fear however that the tests aren't going to be
> the problem, but rather running them consistently when a unused
> interface is added.
> 
> I might be wrong with that assumption though

In the long run I'm not really concerned, as there will eventually be a
refpolicy->CIL compiler[1], which would do syntax checking on
interfaces, since they would be proper language constructs, instead of
macros.

[1] https://bitbucket.org/jwcarter/fpp

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com