From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [RFC] sched policies for candump Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <5492DBCF.2010500@hartkopp.net> References: <53D204A4.1060502@pengutronix.de> <53D2126C.40600@pengutronix.de> <53D214E2.7020205@pengutronix.de> <53D219E8.5060307@pengutronix.de> <53D234D9.2010602@hartkopp.net> <53D91AB5.5060507@hartkopp.net> <53DA39CF.2070303@pengutronix.de> <53DA4E89.1080206@hartkopp.net> <5492A166.4090806@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.219]:38294 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968AbaLRNvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:51:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Prabhakar Lad Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" On 18.12.2014 13:33, Prabhakar Lad wrote: >> Is this still needed / valuable? >> > If I remember correctly we agreed upon using chrt/nice to achieve this. > > But I still feel having an option in the tool itself would be better > choice as some > of the novice users might not be aware of chrt/nice. > Ah - now I remember myself. The point was that you then become in charge to put this into all relevant tools - which is probably not what you want. So increase the awareness for novice users to use chrt/nice looks like the better option ;-) Best regards, Oliver