From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 320 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:06:19 UTC Received: from smtp01.online.nl (smtp01.online.nl [194.134.41.31]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F46725F4 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp01.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7428E11C for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (s55969068.adsl.online.nl [85.150.144.104]) by smtp01.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <549EBB98.2090006@topic.nl> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0100 From: Mike Looijmans Organization: Topic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <883cc974857e6896b33eb4be4f5c326840bb90ad.1419471695.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp01.online.nl) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] busybox.inc: fix QA package-missing warnings X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:06:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/26/2014 02:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Hongxu Jia wrote: >> While building busybox with QA package-missing checking enabled, >> there was warning: >> ... >> WARNING: QA Issue: package busybox-mdev not generated, but listed in PACKAGES >> WARNING: QA Issue: package busybox-httpd not generated, but listed in PACKAGES >> ... >> >> The config in ${B}/.config decides to generate busybox-mdev, >> busybox-httpd or not. Files are copied if the packages generated. >> So set PACKAGES in do_package according to the existance of files. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia > > Shouldn't we "invert" the logic here? This patch 'removes' httpd and > mdev when those are not enabled. Why we don't /add/ those when they > are enabled? maybe the answer is in a question: What would happen then if someone typed "bitbake busybox-mdev"? -- Mike Looijmans