From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: Do not ignore device's PXM information Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:31:26 -0500 Message-ID: <54AD514E.3030106@oracle.com> References: <1420510737-22813-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <1420510737-22813-2-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <54AD052F0200007800052277@mail.emea.novell.com> <54AD45D6.6040601@oracle.com> <54AD598D02000078000525AA@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54AD598D02000078000525AA@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ufimtseva@gmail.com, keir@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/07/2015 10:06 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Of course an additional question would be whether the node wouldn't >>> better go into struct arch_pci_dev - that depends on whether we >>> expect ARM to be using NUMA... >> Since we have CPU topology in common code I thought this would be >> arch-independent as well. > Not sure what you're referring to here: What common piece of data > stores the node of a particular CPU? cpu_to_node[] clearly is x86- > specific. I meant that we have common interface (sysctl) for querying topology and PCI is a common IO bus (unlike CPUs) so I figured I'd keep node in common part as well. -boris