From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Cussins Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] alsa-lib: Add snd_pcm_start_at. Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:12:14 +0000 Message-ID: <54AFA97E.3040407@eml.cc> References: <1418837267-10896-1-git-send-email-timcussins@eml.cc> <54ABF0DF.2030805@eml.cc> <54ABF556.6000309@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3026147D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:12:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F82820977 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 05:12:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <54ABF556.6000309@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Pierre-Louis Bossart , tiwai@suse.de Cc: nstoughton@aether.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 06/01/15 14:46, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >> I didn't make it clear that I reworked the patch so that it was >> compatible with, but not dependent on, Pierre's work (viz: Timestamping >> Evolutions). In particular you'll see that I lifted >> snd_pcm_audio_tstamp_t from his patch: This means that our patches can >> be discussed/merged independently. Was this a reasonable approach? > > Fine with me. There may be another dependency though, you probably need > to provide INFO fields and the ability to query whether the hardware > supports this functionality (which brings us back to the discussion on > where to store those fields..) > Fair point :) But the patch, as it stands, doesn't depend on those fields.