All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>
To: "Blinick, Stephen L" <stephen.l.blinick@intel.com>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memstore performance improvements v0.90 vs v0.87
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:43:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B6F103.9000708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3649A15A2562B54294DE14BCE5AC79120AB30EEA@FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>

On 01/14/2015 04:32 PM, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> I went back and grabbed 87 and built it on RHEL7 as well, and performance is also similar (much better).  I've also run it on a few systems (Dual socket 10-core E5v2,  Dual socket 6-core E5v3).  So, it's related to my switch to RHEL7, and not to the code changes between v0.90 and v0.87.     Will post when I get more data.

Stephen, you are practically writing press releases for the RHEL guys 
here! ;)

Mark

>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Blinick, Stephen L
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:06 AM
> To: Ceph Development
> Subject: Memstore performance improvements v0.90 vs v0.87
>
> In the process of moving to a new cluster (RHEL7 based) I grabbed v0.90, compiled RPM's and re-ran the simple local-node memstore test I've run on .80 - .87.  It's a single Memstore OSD and a single Rados Bench client locally on the same node.  Increasing queue depth and measuring latency /IOPS.  So far, the measurements have been consistent across different hardware and code releases (with about a 30% improvement with the OpWQ Sharding changes that came in after Firefly).
>
> These are just very early results, but I'm seeing a very large improvement in latency and throughput with v90 on RHEL7.   Next  I'm working to get lttng installed and working in RHEL7 to determine where the improvement is.   On previous levels, these measurements have been roughly the same using a real (fast) backend (i.e. NVMe flash), and I will verify here as well.   Just wondering if anyone else has measured similar improvements?
>
>
> 100% Reads or Writes, 4K Objects, Rados Bench
>
> ========================
> V0.87: Ubuntu 14.04LTS
>
> *Writes*
> #Thr	IOPS	Latency(ms)
> 1	618.80		1.61
> 2	1401.70		1.42
> 4	3962.73		1.00
> 8	7354.37		1.10
> 16	7654.67		2.10
> 32	7320.33		4.37
> 64	7424.27		8.62
>
> *Reads*
> #thr	IOPS	Latency(ms)
> 1	837.57		1.19
> 2	1950.00		1.02
> 4	6494.03		0.61
> 8	7243.53		1.10
> 16	7473.73		2.14
> 32	7682.80		4.16
> 64	7727.10		8.28
>
>
> ========================
> V0.90:  RHEL7
>
> *Writes*
> #Thr	IOPS	Latency(ms)
> 1	2558.53		0.39
> 2	6014.67		0.33
> 4	10061.33	0.40
> 8	14169.60	0.56
> 16	14355.63	1.11
> 32	14150.30	2.26
> 64	15283.33	4.19
>
> *Reads*
> #Thr	IOPS	Latency(ms)
> 1	4535.63		0.22
> 2	9969.73		0.20
> 4	17049.43	0.23
> 8	19909.70	0.40
> 16	20320.80	0.79
> 32	19827.93	1.61
> 64	22371.17	2.86
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14  7:05 Memstore performance improvements v0.90 vs v0.87 Blinick, Stephen L
2015-01-14 22:32 ` Blinick, Stephen L
2015-01-14 22:43   ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2015-01-14 23:39     ` Blinick, Stephen L
2015-01-27 21:03       ` Mark Nelson
2015-01-28  1:23         ` Blinick, Stephen L
2015-01-28 21:51           ` Mark Nelson
2015-01-29 12:51             ` James Page
2015-02-20  9:07         ` James Page
2015-02-20  9:49           ` Blair Bethwaite
2015-02-20 10:09             ` Haomai Wang
2015-02-20 15:38             ` Mark Nelson
     [not found]               ` <524687337.1545267.1424448115086.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>
2015-02-20 16:03                 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-02-20 16:12                   ` Mark Nelson
     [not found]                     ` <298703592.1573873.1424506210041.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>
2015-02-21  8:10                       ` Alexandre DERUMIER
     [not found]                         ` <1429598219.1574757.1424509359439.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>
2015-02-21  9:02                           ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-02-20 18:38                   ` Stefan Priebe
2015-02-20 15:51           ` Mark Nelson
2015-02-20 15:58             ` James Page
2015-01-14 22:44   ` Somnath Roy
2015-01-14 23:37     ` Blinick, Stephen L
2015-01-15 10:43     ` Andreas Bluemle
2015-01-15 17:09       ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:15       ` Sage Weil
2015-01-19  9:28         ` Andreas Bluemle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B6F103.9000708@redhat.com \
    --to=mark.nelson@inktank.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnelson@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen.l.blinick@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.