From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDxZO-0005DT-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:51:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDxZK-0001CX-32 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:51:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDxZJ-0001B2-P9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:51:45 -0500 Message-ID: <54BFCB0F.2010002@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:51:43 -0700 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1421080265-2228-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <1421080265-2228-4-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <54B93014.8010203@redhat.com> <54B940F7.7000904@redhat.com> <87oapvnkv1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <54BD7191.2060404@redhat.com> <87sif57t8k.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <54BE86F0.2000408@redhat.com> <878ugwpjdv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <878ugwpjdv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvS4sfWqdERSVTnNKxMrLNxTPD4DrvdO1" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 03/13] qmp: Add block-dirty-bitmap-add and block-dirty-bitmap-remove List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster , John Snow Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , vsementsov@parallels.com, stefanha@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GvS4sfWqdERSVTnNKxMrLNxTPD4DrvdO1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/21/2015 02:34 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Opinions? >=20 I'm still thinking about my reply (it's a big enough question that I want to make sure I consider ramifications), so this is just a meta-reply to let you know I'm tracking this conversation. >>>> CC'ing Eric Blake, as well, for comments on a "unified parameter" >>>> interface in general. >>> >>> Good move. >>> >>> >>> [*] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-12/msg02572= =2Ehtml >>> >> >> Adding Eric back in, where'd he go? >=20 > Looks like you announced the cc:, but didn't actually do it, twice %-) I know that on some lists I'm subscribed to, mailman has an annoying configuration where if a list member is subscribed to the list and has requested that mailman not send dupe emails, then mailman rewrites CC: lines to drop that list member from the copy of the mail that other list readers receive. I hate the behavior, but it may be why you appear to not see me in cc, even though I've definitely been receiving the mails. At any rate, I have my mail filters set to flag mails that call out my name, even if I get left out from cc, so I can usually spot threads like this where you are trying to get my attention, regardless of whether you remembered to include me directly. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --GvS4sfWqdERSVTnNKxMrLNxTPD4DrvdO1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUv8sPAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqNIsH+gOcnVdOQ3OcOhx8TL4X5i/Z XYUd8CDIpf4sEI93neFa1N4qPyALNEG3Tpn9QT7A9OhWWQhJfHjrzDFYUA2EHj2x SYCXOrJ+Z5C3tL4vJ9yI2RtfuVWURfEM8/HHsaOkHDLKYeYMZ12HTALfpIuBZnX5 3nID4OThznz8g+eJmP7FNnapte8BJ09Ne1WdmC2CVnRGuMknju3sJV5pa6vOj5F2 GnGznedrBplLX1MjSyi01K6SIytoqcW/XWFE46PDdiP2SCi4Y7wqiQMoc8Hm6VZI W2bk8i2wlhPCEioRApZiVXeMriRxTevtwGnSajOtYp+Y2FGsZErU6gOYF/rtOtE= =TyeF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvS4sfWqdERSVTnNKxMrLNxTPD4DrvdO1--