From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "christophe.ricard" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] st33zp24 new architecture proposal and st33zp24 spi driver Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:11:48 +0100 Message-ID: <54C6BBA4.1010208@gmail.com> References: <1422220293-21005-1-git-send-email-christophe-h.ricard@st.com> <201501262239.25303.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201501262239.25303.PeterHuewe-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Peter_H=FCwe?= Cc: ashley-fm2HMyfA2y6tG0bUXCXiUA@public.gmane.org, tpmdd-yWjUBOtONefk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org, tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, christophe-h.ricard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, jean-luc.blanc-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, benoit.houyere-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, Thanks for your time. I think it will be fine to wait for kernel 3.21. Best Regards Christophe On 26/01/2015 22:39, Peter H=FCwe wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > Am Sonntag, 25. Januar 2015, 22:11:29 schrieb Christophe Ricard: >> Hi, >> >> The following patchset: >> - propose a new architecture allowing to share a core st33zp24 data >> management layer with different phy (i2c & spi). For st33zp24 both p= hy >> have a proprietary transport protocol. Both are relying on the TCG T= IS >> protocol. At the end, it simplifies the maintenance. - Add an spi ph= y >> allowing to support st33zp24 using with an SPI bus. >> >> The complete solution got tested in polling and interrupt mode succe= ssfully >> with i2c & spi phy. This patchset applies on top of Peter's tree >> https://github.com/PeterHuewe/linux-tpmdd.git for-james branch on to= p of: >> d4989d9f693b9502f9288da5db279c2f8c2e50be tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing if= def >> CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device >> >> I confirm also Jarkko Sakkinen's changes are working with this produ= ct with >> both phy's. >> >> - v2 takes into account feedbacks from Jason Gunthorpe. >> - v3 is reduced to 4 patches as 6 out of 10 got accepted for 3.20. A= lso >> compare to v2: * Fix build issue with patch v2 04/10 "Replace access= to >> io_lpcpd from struct st33zp24_platform_data to tpm_stm_dev" * Fix li= nk >> issue with patch v2 08/10 "Split tpm_i2c_tpm_st33 in 2 layers (core = + >> phy)" when building as a module. The symbols wasn't exported in >> st33zp24.c. >> * Add missing MODULE_LICENSE in patch v2 09/10 "Add st33zp2= 4 spi >> phy" * Fix node example in dts spi documentation in patch v2 10/10 "= Add >> dts documentation for st33zp24 spi phy" * Fix typo on Jason Gunthorp= e >> first name. Sorry for that :(... * Change contact email address as >> tpmsupport-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org is no more valid - v4 adds missing module_license = in >> st33zp24 > I'll review the stuff (since I cannot test :) during the next few day= s. > Meanwhile I added to my 'staging tree' > https://github.com/PeterHuewe/linux-tpmdd/tree/testing-and-review > > I doubt that James will accept it for 3.20. > > Thanks, > Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html