From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support NVGRE on i40e Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:08:12 +0100 Message-ID: <54C8C31C.5020007@6wind.com> References: <1422243805-10906-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Cao, Min" , "Liu, Jijiang" , "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Min, On 01/27/2015 06:46 AM, Cao, Min wrote: > Test by: min.cao > Patch name: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Support NVGRE on i40e > Test Flag: Tested-by > Tester name: min.cao-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > Result summary: total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed > > Test Case 1: > Name: nvgre filter > Environment: OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 > gcc (GCC) 4.8.2 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz > NIC: Fortville eagle > [...] Just one remarq about your test report: it's quite useful to have such reports, showing that a feature is tested. However, I think it would be much better if you provide all the means to reproduce the test (testpmd configuration, scripts to generate packets, ...). For instance, this could help people wanting to implement the same on another PMD to validate with the same test plan than yours. Regards, Olivier