From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/29] net: vrf: Plumbing for vrf context on a socket Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <54D373CA.20008@6wind.com> References: <1423100070-31848-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <1423100070-31848-19-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com To: David Ahern , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:56364 "EHLO mail-we0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752640AbbBENoo (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:44:44 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w55so7777003wes.1 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:44:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1423100070-31848-19-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 05/02/2015 02:34, David Ahern a =C3=A9crit : > Sockets inherit the vrf context of the task opening it. The context c= an > be read/changed via a socket option (IP_VRF_CONTEXT). What about using a common socket option (SO_VRF_CONTEXT) instead of an = ipv4 specific option?