From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/29] net: VRF support Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:08:51 +0100 Message-ID: <54D4D903.7080006@6wind.com> References: <1423100070-31848-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20150205173334.08248382@uryu.home.lan> <54D4227B.6080709@gmail.com> <87r3u3vfpr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <54D45C15.7090602@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Ahern , "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:56888 "EHLO mail-we0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754279AbbBFPIy (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:08:54 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q59so5404885wes.1 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 07:08:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D45C15.7090602@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 06/02/2015 07:15, David Ahern a =E9crit : [snip] > Application code -- open source daemons -- can be modified to be VRF = aware as > needed. Kernel side VRF support would be made a CONFIG option that de= faults off. > The macros will ensure anything VRF related falls out, so server depl= oyments > would not be impacted. Most of distributions enables all kernel options.