Re: 3.19: device name associates with IRQ's for ahci controllers operating with a single IRQ changed from "ahci?" to "<BDF>"

[Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1642 bytes --]

On 09.02.2015 20:54, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> In 3.19 the device name associates with IRQ's for ahci controllers operating
> with a single IRQ changed from "ahci?" to "<BDF>", was this intentional ?
> 
> It's probably commit 18dcf433f3ded61eb140a55e7048ec2fef79e723 (or another one
> in that series). 

Oh, looking at that commit that might make sense. In
ahci_host_activate_single_irq it now uses dev_driver_name instead of dev_name as
it did before (from ata_host_activate).  The description sounds like before the
driver is registered this will return the bus. And registering an interrupt
would likely be before the driver is fully registered... But you probably saw
that, too. Whether that really was intentional is still the question. :)

-Stefan

>
> --
> Sander
> 
> 
> /proc/interrupts of an ahci controller with a single irq:
>  52:      13529          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       0000:00:1f.2
> 
> /proc/interrupts of an ahci controller with multiple irq's:
>  114:     412535          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci0
>  115:          0          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci1
>  116:      16717          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci2
>  117:          0          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci3
>  118:          0          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci4
>  119:          0          0          0          0          0          0  xen-pirq-msi       ahci5
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]