From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] iommu: need_iommu set early Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:46:40 +0000 Message-ID: <54E346400200007800060973@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <20150213185105.GA12720@elena.ufimtseva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150213185105.GA12720@elena.ufimtseva> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Elena Ufimtseva Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, roger.pau@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 13.02.15 at 19:51, wrote: > Set need_iommu for dom0 early so pvh specific functions > in construct_dom0 can pass this check. > See example in p2m-ept.c ept_set_entry. > > Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva Having gone through the rest of this series, I can't see the relation and I also can't see why this would be needed all of the sudden. I was considering to apply this on its own, but without a proper explanation of why it's needed I don't think I should. Jan