From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3153865C85 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1IEsiMM015766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:54:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from Marks-MacBook-Pro.local (172.25.36.234) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:54:44 -0800 Message-ID: <54E4A7B3.9020401@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:54:43 -0600 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Ohly , Dan McGregor References: <1424180525-4138-1-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> <54E3723B.9050606@windriver.com> <54E375B2.9080002@windriver.com> <1424249151.549.17.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1424249151.549.17.camel@intel.com> Cc: Christopher Larson , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] package_rpm.bbclass: support packaging of symlinks to directories X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:54:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/18/15 2:45 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 21:40 -0600, Dan McGregor wrote: >> >> On 17 Feb 2015 11:09, "Mark Hatle" wrote: >>> >>> On 2/17/15 10:57 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Mark Hatle >> >>> > wrote: >>>> This patch doesn't make it walk into the directory symlinks, it moves them into >>>> the files list rather than the dirs list so they'll be captured themselves, as >>>> far as I can tell from reading it. >>> >>> Ok.. I missed that bit.. I'm still curious what this fixes. >>> >> >> I haven't tried myself, but I expect it helps with the /usr merge. > > Correct. I was working on a distro with a modified basefiles recipe > which only had /usr/[lib|bin|sbin] and symlinks to those in /. Without > this patch it was not possible to get these symlinks packaged in the > basefiles rpm. > Thanks, I wasn't aware that the symlinks were not working in the basefiles. --Mark