From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <54E5D832.6040505@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:03:54 +0530 From: Harish Jenny Kandiga Nagaraj MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucas De Marchi CC: Rusty Russell , linux-modules , lkml , greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] libkmod-module: Remove directory existence check for KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN References: <1424177796-17923-1-git-send-email-harish_kandiga@mentor.com> <874mqjuaky.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87vbiysv1v.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <54E5795C.5050804@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" List-ID: On Thursday 19 February 2015 04:00 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Harish Jenny Kandiga Nagaraj > wrote: >>> Harrish, in your patch if you just change the "return >>> KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN;" to "return KMOD_MODULE_COMING;" does it work? >> Yes. Returning KMOD_MODULE_COMING instead of KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN works. The built-in modules are handled by looking at the modules.builtin index file. Is there any chance of returning KMOD_MODULE_COMING for builti-in modules? If it does not have any impact, then the fix should be fine. > well... you're not returning KMOD_MODULE_COMING for a builtin module. > Having the directory /sys/module/ and not the initstate could be > either that the module is builtin or that there's a race while loading > the module and it's in the coming state. However since we use the > index to decide if this module is builtin in the beginning of this > function, here it can only be the second case. > > However... mod->builtin in the beginning of this function is only set > if the module is created by a lookup rather than from name or from > path.... maybe here we need to actually fallback to the index rather > than the cached value, otherwise this test would fail (considering > "vt" is builtin): > > kmod_module_new_from_name(ctx, "vt", &mod); > kmod_module_get_initstate(mod, &state); > something like this ? diff --git a/libkmod/libkmod-module.c b/libkmod/libkmod-module.c index 19bb2ed..d424f3e 100644 --- a/libkmod/libkmod-module.c +++ b/libkmod/libkmod-module.c @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct kmod_module { * "module", except knowing it's builtin. */ bool builtin : 1; + + bool lookup : 1; }; static inline const char *path_join(const char *path, size_t prefixlen, @@ -215,6 +217,11 @@ void kmod_module_set_builtin(struct kmod_module *mod, bool builtin) mod->builtin = builtin; } +void kmod_module_set_lookup(struct kmod_module *mod, bool lookup) +{ + mod->lookup = lookup; +} + void kmod_module_set_required(struct kmod_module *mod, bool required) { mod->required = required; @@ -1729,7 +1736,7 @@ KMOD_EXPORT int kmod_module_get_initstate(const struct kmod_module *mod) struct stat st; path[pathlen - (sizeof("/initstate") - 1)] = '\0'; if (stat(path, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) - return KMOD_MODULE_COMING; + return mod->lookup ? KMOD_MODULE_COMING : KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN; } DBG(mod->ctx, "could not open '%s': %s\n", diff --git a/tools/modprobe.c b/tools/modprobe.c index 3af16c7..43288b6 100644 --- a/tools/modprobe.c +++ b/tools/modprobe.c @@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ static int insmod(struct kmod_ctx *ctx, const char *alias, if (lookup_only) printf("%s\n", kmod_module_get_name(mod)); else { + kmod_module_set_lookup(mod,true); err = kmod_module_probe_insert_module(mod, flags, extra_options, NULL, NULL, show); } >> Do I need to send a separate patch ? > I was hoping it would be a oneliner, but it isn't. If you are going to > send a patch, please add the necessary checks for the builtin index. > Otherwise I can take a look on this until the end of this week. >