From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Page Subject: Re: Memstore performance improvements v0.90 vs v0.87 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:58:33 +0000 Message-ID: <54E759A9.8020800@ubuntu.com> References: <3649A15A2562B54294DE14BCE5AC79120AB30A5D@FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> <3649A15A2562B54294DE14BCE5AC79120AB30EEA@FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> <54B6F103.9000708@redhat.com> <3649A15A2562B54294DE14BCE5AC79120AB31012@FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> <54C7FD1C.40406@redhat.com> <54E6F96B.9080202@ubuntu.com> <54E7580B.5020300@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:45964 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754680AbbBTP6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:58:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54E7580B.5020300@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson , Ceph Development Cc: "Blinick, Stephen L" , Jay Vosburgh , Colin Ian King , Patricia Gaughen , Leann Ogasawara -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Mark On 20/02/15 15:51, Mark Nelson wrote: >> I've CC'ed both Colin and Jay on this mail - so if anyone has >> any specific questions about the testing they can chime in with >> responses. > Good testing! Other than the NUMA questions in the other posts, is > it possible the disparity we saw could be related to the network > hardware/driver? Our nodes just are using 1GbE Intel I350s. I'm > not sure what Stephen's uses, but given that he's at Intel I > suspect it would also be an Intel NIC. Any chance you could post > the specs of the boxes you guys tested on so we could try to look > for other differences? I know the Dell R610's have Broadcom cards: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet I need to check with Colin in the other machine we used. > Also, was there any additional tuning done on either of the boxes > (other than disabling RHEL's firewall)? No - apart from the firewall disable, that's the only change over default config we made. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.page@ubuntu.com jamespage@debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU51mpAAoJEL/srsug59jDTiMQANJMiLacrGRDcPojBm28a1dr dGifSxO2Vz1EEzH1XpuWYvUf55XYkOubsWSqPtMdzUKVvjIkvedT7rwZWdUoAih4 5z46RvEpMFEdlorg9G09HiVZkCccYJSyN1OkxgLV215jAqbx2fCOKoNEYCZNTjw3 l1wUFR2DNazUvyzTUDx6U0oICqFUYrih/3V6Ip6XFzwc3YxTIRqPvqKxy/4EH/Q4 RFo+PAJmNQAI6mC8oOJ45FCZcGqajN8LOzaMjGQiUrJcB8mYKnXOceb23+UfgpSS TjprLs2wTTRKerOqvVV8pJdEnz+JYET5gJ1WhkCwYf+dT8eJTmpW3nmI/EwmCLKK dLnUd6GbIsfe30/rRGBnYRWKlHWxyXe3DM3BWA/GPExyhNPVDO17pZtvBt30PEJS cQAt4rrndqy0iJwF7T1h+VV0Z9hQ3zpM/cHvJaqhksdcBiRyx/Ac8RC5Eqd0NZov 9wFplIKisci7Nx44tpsOozmOYO2IikwiP45RHdAutV/UOVcAVFLWSHXU2PcqhMSz H0TuUmpSYA9MSkIgza+ueTsFITb/QEZxyCYpvB7Gzrn04g6qZySEjHbma/lKflwZ JUyrQdnCX0nLMMBGjgeH/WmJ7xdlTgDb+W1Vii+KIPLAjRqt/C0V8kk5tqNygi0g KTUDGfuO5UF8VS8Ulg+t =MXKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----