From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757403AbbCCRKo (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:10:44 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:58442 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756509AbbCCRKm (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:10:42 -0500 Message-ID: <54F5EAC8.6040909@ti.com> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:09:28 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck CC: Eduardo Valentin , Jean Delvare , , lkml , dt list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] (gpio-fan): Add thermal control hooks References: <1420740303-12529-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54AF5DA8.6080408@roeck-us.net> <20150224192933.GJ3448@developer.amazonguestwifi.org> <20150224195457.GA16245@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2015 02:06 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:29:35PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> Guenter, >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:48:40PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 01/08/2015 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>>> Allow gpio-fan to be used as thermal cooling device for platforms that >>>>> use GPIO maps to control fans. >>>>> >>>>> As part of this change, we make the shutdown and remove logic the same >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Applied to -next. >>> >>> What is the target kernel version for this change? It didn't make >>> 4.0-rc1 >>> >> If I recall correctly, I had to pull it because the thermal framework >> does not provide hooks if disabled. Weird, I am sure I sent an e-mail >> about this, but I don't find it right now. >> >> It can't make it in before the hooks are in place, or we'll need >> another version with ifdefs around the thermal registration code. > > I had posted the required hooks. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5828261/ -> I think Eduardo picked > this one up.. So once it hits mainline, we should ideally be clear. > merged as 12ca7188468ee29c4e717f73db4bf43c90954fc7 upstream. Can we pick up this patch now? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] (gpio-fan): Add thermal control hooks Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:09:28 -0600 Message-ID: <54F5EAC8.6040909@ti.com> References: <1420740303-12529-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54AF5DA8.6080408@roeck-us.net> <20150224192933.GJ3448@developer.amazonguestwifi.org> <20150224195457.GA16245@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Jean Delvare , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, lkml , dt list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2015 02:06 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:29:35PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> Guenter, >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:48:40PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 01/08/2015 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>>> Allow gpio-fan to be used as thermal cooling device for platforms that >>>>> use GPIO maps to control fans. >>>>> >>>>> As part of this change, we make the shutdown and remove logic the same >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Applied to -next. >>> >>> What is the target kernel version for this change? It didn't make >>> 4.0-rc1 >>> >> If I recall correctly, I had to pull it because the thermal framework >> does not provide hooks if disabled. Weird, I am sure I sent an e-mail >> about this, but I don't find it right now. >> >> It can't make it in before the hooks are in place, or we'll need >> another version with ifdefs around the thermal registration code. > > I had posted the required hooks. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5828261/ -> I think Eduardo picked > this one up.. So once it hits mainline, we should ideally be clear. > merged as 12ca7188468ee29c4e717f73db4bf43c90954fc7 upstream. Can we pick up this patch now? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH V2] (gpio-fan): Add thermal control hooks Message-Id: <54F5EAC8.6040909@ti.com> List-Id: References: <1420740303-12529-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54AF5DA8.6080408@roeck-us.net> <20150224192933.GJ3448@developer.amazonguestwifi.org> <20150224195457.GA16245@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Jean Delvare , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, lkml , dt list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On 02/24/2015 02:06 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:29:35PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> Guenter, >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:48:40PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 01/08/2015 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>>> Allow gpio-fan to be used as thermal cooling device for platforms that >>>>> use GPIO maps to control fans. >>>>> >>>>> As part of this change, we make the shutdown and remove logic the same >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Applied to -next. >>> >>> What is the target kernel version for this change? It didn't make >>> 4.0-rc1 >>> >> If I recall correctly, I had to pull it because the thermal framework >> does not provide hooks if disabled. Weird, I am sure I sent an e-mail >> about this, but I don't find it right now. >> >> It can't make it in before the hooks are in place, or we'll need >> another version with ifdefs around the thermal registration code. > > I had posted the required hooks. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5828261/ -> I think Eduardo picked > this one up.. So once it hits mainline, we should ideally be clear. > merged as 12ca7188468ee29c4e717f73db4bf43c90954fc7 upstream. Can we pick up this patch now? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors