From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yijing Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/30] PCI: Export busn_resource to drivers/pci Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:57:25 +0800 Message-ID: <55024405.8040504__31195.4396580861$1426211930$gmane$org@huawei.com> References: <1425868467-9667-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1425868467-9667-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20150311222835.GA1082@google.com> <55017BA1.7020700@huawei.com> <20150312193219.GA7346@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150312193219.GA7346@google.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jiang Liu , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Rusty Russell , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Guan Xuetao , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Liviu Dudau , Arnd Bergmann , Geert Uytterhoeven >> Hi Bjorn, busn_resource may would not be shared by multi domains, >> >> We insert bus number resource like: >> >> pci_add_resource(&resources, &busn_resource); >> pci_bus_insert_busn_res(root_bus, start, bus_max); //start is the root bus number provided by arch pci host driver, bus max here == 255 >> get_pci_domain_busn_res(domain) //for root bus //try to get a domain specific pci_domain_busn_res, if not exist, create it. >> request_resource_conflict(domain_specific_busn_res, res) //request busn res(start, bus_max) from the pci_domain_busn_res. >> >> So every domain has its own pci_domain_busn_res , different domain would not share the same bus number resource. > > The intent of pci_add_resource() and passing the resulting resource list > into pci_scan_root_bus(), etc., is that the host bridge may consume any > resources described by the list. If we pass the same resource to multiple > calls, that means the resource must be shared between the multiple host > bridges involved. For bus numbers, that makes some sense if the platform > considers the bridges to be in the same domain, but not if they are in > different domains. > > If we export busn_resource, we have no control over what domains it becomes > associated with because the domain is passed into pci_scan_root_bus() by > the caller. Agree, I will drop this patch, thanks! > > Bjorn > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing