From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <55081474.5010303@xenomai.org> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:48:04 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Question about Xenomai List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: manrico.quadrelli@marposs.com, xenomai@xenomai.org On 03/17/2015 09:14 AM, manrico.quadrelli@marposs.com wrote: > Hi, > I'm interested to implement the new kernel version available from Yocto > released for i.MX6Q (i.e. 3.10.17-1.0.2 or 3.10.53-1.1.0) with Xenomai > extension and RTnet driver. Xenomai is likely to be the least of your problems on those Freescale-originated kernels. > I would like to know if there is a supported version of patches for > Xenomai for these releases of standard Yocto kernel. Our patches for 3.10.32 apply almost cleanly to 3.10.17-fsl, but may require a few fixups on .53. > Any advice on which kind of solution can I test? > Do you think that Xenomai 3 can solve this problem? This is not a Xenomai 2 vs 3 issue. 2.x will support a 3.10 kernel the same way. > Do you have an estimated date for the relese of a stable version of Xenami > 3? When we are happy with the level of testing, and feedback from people who are currently helping in raising it. -- Philippe.