From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: rdmacm-utils: Missing man pages for cmtime and udpong Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: <550f6e6a-931a-0aba-2d54-1ca1b3a44150@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1493040510.17795.3.camel@profitbricks.com> <20170425180423.GT14088@mtr-leonro.local> <1493198562.3837.2.camel@profitbricks.com> <20170427040018.GY14088@mtr-leonro.local> <1493370517.3837.9.camel@profitbricks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1493370517.3837.9.camel-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Drung , List Linux RDMA Mailing , Leon Romanovsky List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 4/28/2017 5:08 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 27.04.2017, 07:00 +0300 schrieb Leon Romanovsky: >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:22:42AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2017, 21:04 +0300 schrieb Leon Romanovsky: >>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> the rdmacm-utils binaries cmtime and udpong do not have a >>>>> corresponding >>>>> man page. Please add some since Debian recommends to ship man >>>>> pages >>>>> for all binaries. >>>> >>>> Is it requirement or recommendation? >>> >>> I looked it up. It's considered a bug. The Debian policy says in >>> ยง12.1: >> >> I understand, I just don't see many volunteers :( to write it. > > Normally the authors of the program are in the best position to write > such a man page instead of the people from the distributions. There is now PR #124 in rdma-core github to resolve this. I've asked Sean to review as he is the author of those examples. -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html