From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5512850D.4030606@mitrol.it> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:51:09 +0100 From: Paolo Minazzi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55127004.3010708@mitrol.it> <20150325083622.GF15125@hermes.click-hack.org> <55127908.5050202@mitrol.it> <20150325090354.GG15125@hermes.click-hack.org> <55127BB1.7040804@mitrol.it> <20150325092001.GI15125@hermes.click-hack.org> In-Reply-To: <20150325092001.GI15125@hermes.click-hack.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] fault in ppd_lookup_inner List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org >> I understand ... I port the fix to avoid compatililityproblem. >> I made only ksrc changes, so my user space is 100% compatible. > There is no compatibility problem between versions of a stable > branch. 2.6.4 is compatible with 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3. It is > even ABI compatible, you do not even have to recompile your > applications. > >> I understand that you do not agree with me because you prefer a clean 2.6.4. >> I can try an other library. Do you mean a smaller library? > Any library that everybody has on his system, to allow reproducing > the issue. You could also try replacing the dlopen with a nanosleep. > >> This is a strange test. I'm trying it because in the past I have had some >> memory corruption that make system instable. >> I would like to be sure about it. > I do not doubt that you observed an issue. I would simply like to be > sure that it has not already been fixed in Xenomai or the I-pipe > patch. > I will make other tests. If I discover something I will write on mailing list. Thanks again, Paolo