* [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL
@ 2015-03-25 4:54 xen.org
2015-03-25 9:16 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-25 9:22 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: xen.org @ 2015-03-25 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: ian.jackson
flight 36692 linux-next real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 36569
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 11 rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels fail like 36569
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail blocked in 36569
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 36569
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail like 36569
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-midway 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 10 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
linux 899e56ad58f544e115070a7b4bd7b2dafc646936
baseline version:
linux b314acaccd7e0d55314d96be4a33b5f50d0b3344
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-armhf-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops fail
build-i386-pvops pass
build-amd64-rumpuserxen pass
build-i386-rumpuserxen pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 fail
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-midway blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Push not applicable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL
2015-03-25 4:54 [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL xen.org
@ 2015-03-25 9:16 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-25 13:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-25 9:22 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-03-25 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel; +Cc: xen-devel
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 04:54 +0000, xen.org wrote:
> flight 36692 linux-next real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
> test-amd64-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
Looks like there is a regression for 32-bit dom0?
The three logs I looked at stopped after:
Mar 24 14:28:10.658757 [ 5.705317] random: nonblocking pool is initialized
One of them had something more interesting though,right after the
non-blocking pool
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-lace-bug.log:
Mar 24 15:57:13.494608 [ 24.445372] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Mar 24 15:57:32.510635 [ 24.445389] (detected by 0, t=21002 jiffies, g=-282, c=-283, q=36)
Mar 24 15:57:32.522591 [ 24.445397] All QSes seen, last rcu_sched kthread activity 21002 (-278938--299940), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
Mar 24 15:57:32.530599 [ 24.445405] migration/0 R running 0 9 2 0x00000000
Mar 24 15:57:32.530635 [ 24.445411] db4bb000 db4bb000 db4e1cb4 c10cbac4 c188e078 00000000 00000009 00000002
Mar 24 15:57:32.542606 [ 24.445422] 00000000 c19649c0 c19649c0 db4e1d00 c10f5bdf c18890d4 c1964c40 0000520a
Mar 24 15:57:32.550610 [ 24.445433] fffbbe66 fffb6c5c 00000003 00000000 c19600c0 c19649c0 00000024 00000000
Mar 24 15:57:32.562630 [ 24.445444] Call Trace:
Mar 24 15:57:32.562665 [ 24.445451] [<c10cbac4>] sched_show_task+0xb4/0x130
Mar 24 15:57:32.570629 [ 24.445457] [<c10f5bdf>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x63f/0x650
Mar 24 15:57:32.570675 [ 24.445463] [<c10fa26a>] update_process_times+0x2a/0x60
Mar 24 15:57:32.582594 [ 24.445469] [<c11084f5>] tick_periodic+0x25/0x90
Mar 24 15:57:32.582630 [ 24.445510] [<c11086ef>] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x70
Mar 24 15:57:32.590594 [ 24.445516] [<c1055904>] xen_timer_interrupt+0x24/0x1e0
Mar 24 15:57:32.590629 [ 24.445522] [<c1390498>] ? add_interrupt_randomness+0x38/0x1b0
Mar 24 15:57:32.602594 [ 24.445528] [<c10ec544>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x1d0
Mar 24 15:57:32.602667 [ 24.445534] [<c10ebcef>] ? irq_to_desc+0xf/0x20
Mar 24 15:57:32.610603 [ 24.445539] [<c10ee968>] ? irq_get_irq_data+0x8/0x10
Mar 24 15:57:32.610639 [ 24.445544] [<c13532a3>] ? evtchn_from_irq+0x13/0x50
Mar 24 15:57:32.622602 [ 24.445550] [<c10ef3f3>] handle_percpu_irq+0x33/0x50
Mar 24 15:57:32.622640 [ 24.445555] [<c10ebd78>] generic_handle_irq+0x18/0x30
Mar 24 15:57:32.630604 [ 24.445561] [<c13555c1>] evtchn_fifo_handle_events+0x111/0x120
Mar 24 15:57:32.642584 [ 24.445567] [<c1352bcc>] __xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x3c/0x80
Mar 24 15:57:32.642620 [ 24.445572] [<c13546a2>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x22/0x40
Mar 24 15:57:32.650597 [ 24.445577] [<c1722abb>] xen_do_upcall+0x7/0x14
Mar 24 15:57:32.650632 [ 24.445584] [<c11208bf>] ? multi_cpu_stop+0x5f/0x100
Mar 24 15:57:32.662585 [ 24.445589] [<c1120860>] ? cpu_stopper_thread+0x150/0x150
Mar 24 15:57:32.662622 [ 24.445595] [<c112077e>] cpu_stopper_thread+0x6e/0x150
Mar 24 15:57:32.670617 [ 24.445600] [<c105089b>] ? xen_load_sp0+0xab/0x140
Mar 24 15:57:32.670657 [ 24.445606] [<c105d5a3>] ? __switch_to+0x183/0x4e0
Mar 24 15:57:32.682589 [ 24.445611] [<c10c8236>] ? finish_task_switch+0x66/0x140
Mar 24 15:57:32.682626 [ 24.445617] [<c171e095>] ? __schedule+0x375/0x8c5
Mar 24 15:57:32.690620 [ 24.445622] [<c171e095>] ? __schedule+0x375/0x8c5
Mar 24 15:57:32.690658 [ 24.445628] [<c1721942>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0xa0
Mar 24 15:57:32.702647 [ 24.445634] [<c1721798>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x28/0x70
Mar 24 15:57:32.702688 [ 24.445641] [<c10c43fb>] smpboot_thread_fn+0xeb/0x130
Mar 24 15:57:32.710646 [ 24.445647] [<c10c4310>] ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
Mar 24 15:57:32.710695 [ 24.445652] [<c10c1506>] kthread+0x96/0xb0
Mar 24 15:57:32.722649 [ 24.445656] [<c1721e81>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30
Mar 24 15:57:32.722695 [ 24.445662] [<c10c1470>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
Mar 24 15:57:32.730640 [ 24.445667] rcu_sched kthread starved for 21002 jiffies!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL
2015-03-25 4:54 [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2015-03-25 9:16 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-03-25 9:22 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-03-25 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel; +Cc: xen-devel
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 04:54 +0000, xen.org wrote:
> flight 36692 linux-next real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
I replied separately to all the test-amd64-i386-* ones.
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 36569
Guest log ends
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu/guest-debian.guest.osstest-console
[ 0.280449] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000f8
[ 0.280483] IP: [<ffffffff81425473>] free_cache_attributes+0xa3/0x110
[ 0.281024] PGD 0
[ 0.281024] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[ 0.281024] Modules linked in:
[ 0.281024] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.0.0-rc4-next-20150323 #1
[ 0.281024] task: ffff88001e8c0000 ti: ffff88001e8c8000 task.ti: ffff88001e8c8000
[ 0.281024] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81425473>] [<ffffffff81425473>] free_cache_attributes+0xa3/0x110
[ 0.281024] RSP: e02b:ffff88001e8cbe08 EFLAGS: 00010206
[ 0.281024] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88001eb0acf8 RCX: 00000000000000d8
[ 0.281024] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: fffffffffffffffe RDI: ffff88001eb0acf8
[ 0.281024] RBP: ffff88001e8cbe58 R08: 000000000000000f R09: 0000000000000000
[ 0.281024] R10: ffff88001f6cedc0 R11: ffffffff813258a0 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 0.281024] R13: 00000000000000d8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000010670
[ 0.281024] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001fa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 0.281024] CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 0.281024] CR2: 00000000000000f8 CR3: 0000000001e0e000 CR4: 0000000000000660
[ 0.281024] Stack:
[ 0.281024] ffff8800ffffffea 0000000000010670 ffff88001fa10670 0000000300010680
[ 0.281024] ffff88001e8cbe88 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffea 0000000000000000
[ 0.281024] ffffffff81ec49e8 0000000000000000 ffff88001e8cbe88 ffffffff81f28079
[ 0.281024] Call Trace:
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81f28079>] cacheinfo_sysfs_init+0x40/0x93
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81f28039>] ? container_dev_init+0x2f/0x2f
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81002124>] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x1e0
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff810f126e>] ? __wake_up+0x4e/0x70
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81ee8310>] kernel_init_freeable+0x15e/0x1f8
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81ee79b5>] ? do_early_param+0x8c/0x8c
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff817f1b50>] ? rest_init+0x70/0x70
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff817f1b59>] kernel_init+0x9/0xf0
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff81808853>] ret_from_fork+0x53/0x80
[ 0.281024] [<ffffffff817f1b50>] ? rest_init+0x70/0x70
[ 0.281024] Code: 48 89 df 48 63 d2 e8 2d 2c f1 ff 39 05 d7 06 aa 00 89 c2 76 2b 41 39 d4 74 de 89 d1 48 8b 0c cd 40 45 ec 81 49 8b 0c 0f 4c 01 e9 <f0> 4c 0f b3 71 20 89 c0 f0 48 0f b3 03 eb be 66 0f 1f 44 00 00
[ 0.281024] RIP [<ffffffff81425473>] free_cache_attributes+0xa3/0x110
[ 0.281024] RSP <ffff88001e8cbe08>
[ 0.281024] CR2: 00000000000000f8
[ 0.281024] ---[ end trace ff2aa05e6cc4a726 ]---
[ 0.399540] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009
with a prior WARNING which looks related. Looks most likely to be a
generic issue?
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 36569
Similar trace to above.
> build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 36569
ld:./arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds:544: syntax error
=> Likely a generic issue.
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 36569
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
"Before starting OpenSSH service you must..." Is this a problem with the
test image perhaps?
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL
2015-03-25 9:16 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-03-25 13:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boris Ostrovsky @ 2015-03-25 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell, xen.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, David Vrabel; +Cc: xen-devel
On 03/25/2015 05:16 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 04:54 +0000, xen.org wrote:
>> flight 36692 linux-next real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
>> test-amd64-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 36569
> Looks like there is a regression for 32-bit dom0?
Yes, I was able to reproduce it (we typically don't test linux-next here
which is why I didn't see it).
64-bit looks OK though, I don't see problems that you reported in the
other message.
-boris
>
> The three logs I looked at stopped after:
> Mar 24 14:28:10.658757 [ 5.705317] random: nonblocking pool is initialized
>
> One of them had something more interesting though,right after the
> non-blocking pool
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36692/test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-lace-bug.log:
>
> Mar 24 15:57:13.494608 [ 24.445372] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> Mar 24 15:57:32.510635 [ 24.445389] (detected by 0, t=21002 jiffies, g=-282, c=-283, q=36)
> Mar 24 15:57:32.522591 [ 24.445397] All QSes seen, last rcu_sched kthread activity 21002 (-278938--299940), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.530599 [ 24.445405] migration/0 R running 0 9 2 0x00000000
> Mar 24 15:57:32.530635 [ 24.445411] db4bb000 db4bb000 db4e1cb4 c10cbac4 c188e078 00000000 00000009 00000002
> Mar 24 15:57:32.542606 [ 24.445422] 00000000 c19649c0 c19649c0 db4e1d00 c10f5bdf c18890d4 c1964c40 0000520a
> Mar 24 15:57:32.550610 [ 24.445433] fffbbe66 fffb6c5c 00000003 00000000 c19600c0 c19649c0 00000024 00000000
> Mar 24 15:57:32.562630 [ 24.445444] Call Trace:
> Mar 24 15:57:32.562665 [ 24.445451] [<c10cbac4>] sched_show_task+0xb4/0x130
> Mar 24 15:57:32.570629 [ 24.445457] [<c10f5bdf>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x63f/0x650
> Mar 24 15:57:32.570675 [ 24.445463] [<c10fa26a>] update_process_times+0x2a/0x60
> Mar 24 15:57:32.582594 [ 24.445469] [<c11084f5>] tick_periodic+0x25/0x90
> Mar 24 15:57:32.582630 [ 24.445510] [<c11086ef>] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x70
> Mar 24 15:57:32.590594 [ 24.445516] [<c1055904>] xen_timer_interrupt+0x24/0x1e0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.590629 [ 24.445522] [<c1390498>] ? add_interrupt_randomness+0x38/0x1b0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.602594 [ 24.445528] [<c10ec544>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x1d0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.602667 [ 24.445534] [<c10ebcef>] ? irq_to_desc+0xf/0x20
> Mar 24 15:57:32.610603 [ 24.445539] [<c10ee968>] ? irq_get_irq_data+0x8/0x10
> Mar 24 15:57:32.610639 [ 24.445544] [<c13532a3>] ? evtchn_from_irq+0x13/0x50
> Mar 24 15:57:32.622602 [ 24.445550] [<c10ef3f3>] handle_percpu_irq+0x33/0x50
> Mar 24 15:57:32.622640 [ 24.445555] [<c10ebd78>] generic_handle_irq+0x18/0x30
> Mar 24 15:57:32.630604 [ 24.445561] [<c13555c1>] evtchn_fifo_handle_events+0x111/0x120
> Mar 24 15:57:32.642584 [ 24.445567] [<c1352bcc>] __xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x3c/0x80
> Mar 24 15:57:32.642620 [ 24.445572] [<c13546a2>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x22/0x40
> Mar 24 15:57:32.650597 [ 24.445577] [<c1722abb>] xen_do_upcall+0x7/0x14
> Mar 24 15:57:32.650632 [ 24.445584] [<c11208bf>] ? multi_cpu_stop+0x5f/0x100
> Mar 24 15:57:32.662585 [ 24.445589] [<c1120860>] ? cpu_stopper_thread+0x150/0x150
> Mar 24 15:57:32.662622 [ 24.445595] [<c112077e>] cpu_stopper_thread+0x6e/0x150
> Mar 24 15:57:32.670617 [ 24.445600] [<c105089b>] ? xen_load_sp0+0xab/0x140
> Mar 24 15:57:32.670657 [ 24.445606] [<c105d5a3>] ? __switch_to+0x183/0x4e0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.682589 [ 24.445611] [<c10c8236>] ? finish_task_switch+0x66/0x140
> Mar 24 15:57:32.682626 [ 24.445617] [<c171e095>] ? __schedule+0x375/0x8c5
> Mar 24 15:57:32.690620 [ 24.445622] [<c171e095>] ? __schedule+0x375/0x8c5
> Mar 24 15:57:32.690658 [ 24.445628] [<c1721942>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0xa0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.702647 [ 24.445634] [<c1721798>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x28/0x70
> Mar 24 15:57:32.702688 [ 24.445641] [<c10c43fb>] smpboot_thread_fn+0xeb/0x130
> Mar 24 15:57:32.710646 [ 24.445647] [<c10c4310>] ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
> Mar 24 15:57:32.710695 [ 24.445652] [<c10c1506>] kthread+0x96/0xb0
> Mar 24 15:57:32.722649 [ 24.445656] [<c1721e81>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30
> Mar 24 15:57:32.722695 [ 24.445662] [<c10c1470>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
> Mar 24 15:57:32.730640 [ 24.445667] rcu_sched kthread starved for 21002 jiffies!
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-25 13:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-25 4:54 [linux-next test] 36692: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2015-03-25 9:16 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-25 13:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-25 9:22 ` Ian Campbell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.