From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753916AbbDAOqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:46:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:35106 "EHLO mail-pd0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752850AbbDAOqr (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:46:47 -0400 Message-ID: <551C04D4.4060909@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:46:44 -0600 From: Jens Axboe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rik van Riel , Marcelo Tosatti CC: axboe@kernel.org, fweisbec@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] nohz,blk-mq: do not create blk-mq workqueues on nohz dedicated CPUs References: <20150331102726.076a6860@annuminas.surriel.com> <20150331231700.GB4161@amt.cnet> <551C0273.2030004@kernel.dk> <551C0499.9050904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <551C0499.9050904@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2015 08:45 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 04/01/2015 10:36 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> That wont work for blk-mq, we rely on the characteristics of bound >> workqueues. So it would have to be handled up front, like in the patch I >> sent out. > > Your patch from yesterday looks good. I'll take it for > a spin today (had some other stuff on my plate yesterday). Great, thanks. If we can get it tested, then I can get it queued up for 4.1. -- Jens Axboe