From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753153AbbDBQwm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:52:42 -0400
Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:33581 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752295AbbDBQwl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:52:41 -0400
Message-ID: <551D73D6.6030100@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:52:38 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Open Source Group
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?windows-1252?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= <P@draigBrady.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
        Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] ftracetest: Do not use usleep directly
References: <1427948663-25048-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1427949253-26883-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <551CDA6C.50106@hitachi.com> <20150402093827.617192f0@gandalf.local.home> <551D5019.9010806@osg.samsung.com> <20150402110846.4e6a756c@gandalf.local.home> <551D6E8D.6040504@osg.samsung.com> <20150402124829.5b617bcd@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20150402124829.5b617bcd@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/02/2015 10:48 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:30:05 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> Anyway, I have this patch tagged for 4.1-rc2
>>>
>>> Why rc2?
>>
>> I usually let the patches stay in next for a few days before
>> I send pull request. It is getting close to that, so decided
>> on rc2 as a better choice.
>>
>> We are at rc-6 at the moment, maybe there is enough time for
>> this to get into rc-1
>>
> 
> But the merge window closes at the rc1 release. Is this also a "stable"
> thing? It should be labeled as such if that's the case.
> 

I am treating this as a fix so rc2 would be fine, however, if I can
get the rebased patch soon I can take it in for rc1.

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978