All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, patches@apm.com,
	christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: X-Gene Storm check GIC DIST address for EOI quirk
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 16:47:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55229C89.9080400@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428310441-5412-1-git-send-email-pranavkumar@linaro.org>

Hi Pranav,

Thank you for the patch.

On 06/04/2015 10:54, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> In old X-Gene Storm firmware and DT, secure mode addresses have been
> mentioned in GICv2 node. In this case maintenance interrupt is used
> instead of EOI HW method.
>
> This patch checks the GIC Distributor Base Address to enable EOI quirk
> for old firmware.
>
> Ref:
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-07/msg01263.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>   xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
> index eee650e..dd7cbfc 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xgene-storm.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   #include <asm/platform.h>
>   #include <xen/stdbool.h>
>   #include <xen/vmap.h>
> +#include <xen/device_tree.h>
>   #include <asm/io.h>
>   #include <asm/gic.h>
>
> @@ -35,9 +36,41 @@ static u64 reset_addr, reset_size;
>   static u32 reset_mask;
>   static bool reset_vals_valid = false;
>
> +#define XGENE_SEC_GICV2_DIST_ADDR    0x78010000
> +static u32 quirk_guest_pirq_need_eoi;

This variable will mostly be read. So, I would add __read_mostly.

> +
> +static void xgene_check_pirq_eoi(void)

If I'm not mistaken, this function is only called during Xen 
initialization. So, I would add __init.

> +{
> +    struct dt_device_node *node;
> +    int res;
> +    paddr_t dbase;
> +
> +    dt_for_each_device_node( dt_host, node )
> +    {

It would be better to create a new callback for platform specific GIC 
initialization and use dt_interrupt_controller.

This would avoid to have this loop and rely on there is always only one 
interrupt controller in the DT.

> +        if ( !dt_get_property(node, "interrupt-controller", NULL) )
> +            continue;
> +
> +        res = dt_device_get_address(node, 0, &dbase, NULL);
> +        if ( !dbase )
> +            panic("%s: Cannot find a valid address for the "
> +                    "distributor", __func__);
> +
> +        /*
> +         * In old X-Gene Storm firmware and DT, secure mode addresses have
> +         * been mentioned in GICv2 node. We have to use maintenance interrupt
> +         * instead of EOI HW in this case. We check the GIC Distributor Base
> +         * Address to maintain compatibility with older firmware.
> +         */
> +         if (dbase == XGENE_SEC_GICV2_DIST_ADDR)

Coding style:

if ( ... )

> +             quirk_guest_pirq_need_eoi = PLATFORM_QUIRK_GUEST_PIRQ_NEED_EOI;
> +         else
> +             quirk_guest_pirq_need_eoi = 0;

I would print a warning in order to notify the user that his platform 
would be slow/buggy...

> +    }
> +}
> +
>   static uint32_t xgene_storm_quirks(void)
>   {
> -    return PLATFORM_QUIRK_GIC_64K_STRIDE|PLATFORM_QUIRK_GUEST_PIRQ_NEED_EOI;
> +    return PLATFORM_QUIRK_GIC_64K_STRIDE| quirk_guest_pirq_need_eoi;

This function is called every time Xen injects a physical IRQ to a guest 
(i.e very often). It might be better to create a variable quirks which 
will contain PLATFORM_QUIRK_GIC_64K_STRIDE and, when necessary, 
PLATFORM_QUIRK_GUEST_PIRQ_NEED_EOI.

That would avoid the "or" at each call.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-06 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-06  8:54 [PATCH] xen: arm: X-Gene Storm check GIC DIST address for EOI quirk Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-04-06 14:47 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-04-07  9:40   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-04-07 10:29     ` Julien Grall
2015-04-15 16:16       ` Ian Campbell
2015-04-16  5:59         ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-04-08  8:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13  6:12   ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55229C89.9080400@citrix.com \
    --to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@apm.com \
    --cc=pranavkumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.