From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7BC0CE00957; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:22:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Greylist: delayed 578 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:22:04 PDT Received: from mail.taydin.org (bonsai.taydin.org [213.14.134.124]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15DE008EC for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.8.0.214] (27.127.158.98.client.static.strong-in26.as13926.net [98.158.127.27]) by mail.taydin.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69564440032 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:12:23 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <55267AB3.1000304@taydin.org> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:12:19 +0300 From: Timur Aydin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto Subject: toaster configuration variables X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:22:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am using yocto version 1.6.2 Daisy branch to build a linux distribution for the imx6 processor. I have started the toaster prior to the build and after the build is done, I have examined the bitbake configuration variables. It looks like the variable values displayed by the toaster are different from the variable values displayed when using bitbake -e myimage > a.txt The variable I am seeing different is the DISTRO_FEATURES variable. The value that toaster displays seems to be the default value of this variable, whereas the bitbake -e output shows the correct actual value. Also the IMAGE_INSTALL variable does not exist in the toaster user interface, whereas it does exist in the bitbake -e output. What could be the problem? Is toaster experimental at this time? -- Timur