From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754692AbbDMWQF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:16:05 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:34951 "EHLO mail-la0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754190AbbDMWQB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: <552C401D.4000108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:15:57 +0200 From: Mateusz Kulikowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] staging: rtl8192e: Fix more checkpatch.pl warnings References: <1428961664-4241-1-git-send-email-mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com> <20150413221222.GA10964@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20150413221222.GA10964@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.04.2015 00:12, Dan Carpenter wrote: > I don't know why you are doing a v2. I went back to the original thread > and I see that no one complained about it. > > Since no one replied to v1 thread, then probably Greg is going to apply > that one first because it is first in his inbox. Greg's inbox has > millions and millions of emails so he won't even get to this v2 series > until a few days after he applied the v1 series. > > Instead of sending a v2, just assume that Greg is going to apply the > first set and send the additional cleanups as a separate set. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > Sorry for confusion. I made checkpatch regressions in v1 (that I missed at a time) I will mark (reply-all) v1 as "do-not-apply" - Will that be enough? Regards, Mateusz