From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: Size of irq field Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:34:55 +0100 Message-ID: <552CED4F.7000006@citrix.com> References: <551D61A2.6020201@citrix.com> <551E963C.8000606@citrix.com> <1429007619.15516.22.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1429007619.15516.22.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Embedded-pv-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Iurii Konovalenko , Julien Grall , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 14/04/15 11:33, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Whoops. I didn't spot those one thanks. > > libxc is not ABI stable, we can make these bigger if necessary, or > introduce new interface etc as required depending on how things pan out > at the hypercall layer. FIY, a patch has been sent on the ML see "[PATCH v3] increase size of irq from uint8_t to uint32_t" in order to fix it. Regards, -- Julien Grall