From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:18:16 +0100 Message-ID: <552E48F80200007800072264@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <552D36B60200007800071EEC@mail.emea.novell.com> <20150414135208.GW17670@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1429089091.15516.146.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1429089091.15516.146.camel@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Wei Liu Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 15.04.15 at 11:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. >> > >> > Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails >> > you send in this regard? >> > >> >> No problem. > > Should we also ask people to trim the CC list to just those interested > in the quoted stuff? Or do people think that erring on the side of not > trimming too many people? > > People might also to consider changing the subject, e.g. "Status of $FOO > (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder))". Both good ideas imo. Jan