From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756870AbbDVDNT (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:13:19 -0400 Received: from e19.ny.us.ibm.com ([129.33.205.209]:52885 "EHLO e19.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756855AbbDVDNR (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: <553711C4.5050701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:43:08 +0530 From: Preeti U Murthy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Viresh Kumar , Marcelo Tosatti , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [patch 10/39] hrtimer: Use cpu_base->active_base for hotpath iterators References: <20150414203303.702062272@linutronix.de> <20150414203501.322887675@linutronix.de> <5534E00F.2040606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15042203-0013-0000-0000-000000712315 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/21/2015 05:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > >> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for >> >> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring >> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be >> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is >> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue >> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what >> the statement was referring to. > > Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy > > Thanks, > > tglx >