From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: omap_l3_noc: Fix master id address decoding for OMAP5 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:55:52 -0500 Message-ID: <553A9FC8.8060405@ti.com> References: <1429898060-51944-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <553A8C68.5080903@ti.com> <553A951A.1080905@ti.com> <553A9F8B.7010205@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <553A9F8B.7010205@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Suman Anna Cc: Tony Lindgren , dt list , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/24/2015 02:54 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 04/24/2015 02:38 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote: >>> On 04/24/2015 01:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>> On 04/24/2015 12:54 PM, Suman Anna wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> -static struct l3_target_data omap_l3_target_data_clk3[] = { >>>>> - {0x0100, "EMUSS",}, >>>>> - {0x0300, "DEBUG SOURCE",}, >>>>> - {0x0, "HOST CLK3",}, >> ^^ this was HOST CLK3 >> .. >>>>> >>>>> +/* OMAP5 data */ >>>>> +static struct l3_target_data omap5_l3_target_data_clk3[] = { >>>>> + {0x0100, "L3INSTR",}, >>>>> + {0x0300, "DEBUGSS",}, >>>>> + {0x0, "HOSTCLK3",}, >>>> >>>> "HOST CLK" >>> >>> Why? I followed the convention used for the other two HOST CLKs for the >> >> so asked, if it should be HOSTCLK3 > > Aah ok, you missed the trailing number before. In anycase, this was Sorry about that.. > intentional to match HOSTCLK1 and HOSTCLK2 on OMAP4/5. Overall, the > names are somewhat non-standard, some use underscores and some others > strip out the underscore and do not use any spaces in between either. > "HOST CLK3" would be the only one to use a space for OMAP4, so I got rid > of it, so hope that's ok with you. would have been nice to cover that in commit message. no biggie for me. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:55:52 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] bus: omap_l3_noc: Fix master id address decoding for OMAP5 In-Reply-To: <553A9F8B.7010205@ti.com> References: <1429898060-51944-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <553A8C68.5080903@ti.com> <553A951A.1080905@ti.com> <553A9F8B.7010205@ti.com> Message-ID: <553A9FC8.8060405@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/24/2015 02:54 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 04/24/2015 02:38 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote: >>> On 04/24/2015 01:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>> On 04/24/2015 12:54 PM, Suman Anna wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> -static struct l3_target_data omap_l3_target_data_clk3[] = { >>>>> - {0x0100, "EMUSS",}, >>>>> - {0x0300, "DEBUG SOURCE",}, >>>>> - {0x0, "HOST CLK3",}, >> ^^ this was HOST CLK3 >> .. >>>>> >>>>> +/* OMAP5 data */ >>>>> +static struct l3_target_data omap5_l3_target_data_clk3[] = { >>>>> + {0x0100, "L3INSTR",}, >>>>> + {0x0300, "DEBUGSS",}, >>>>> + {0x0, "HOSTCLK3",}, >>>> >>>> "HOST CLK" >>> >>> Why? I followed the convention used for the other two HOST CLKs for the >> >> so asked, if it should be HOSTCLK3 > > Aah ok, you missed the trailing number before. In anycase, this was Sorry about that.. > intentional to match HOSTCLK1 and HOSTCLK2 on OMAP4/5. Overall, the > names are somewhat non-standard, some use underscores and some others > strip out the underscore and do not use any spaces in between either. > "HOST CLK3" would be the only one to use a space for OMAP4, so I got rid > of it, so hope that's ok with you. would have been nice to cover that in commit message. no biggie for me. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon