From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B2172120 for ; Sun, 3 May 2015 02:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t432os7o014635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 May 2015 19:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.local (128.224.23.1) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Sat, 2 May 2015 19:50:54 -0700 Message-ID: <55458D0D.6070904@windriver.com> Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 22:50:53 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <1430521154.18360.28.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <55440C90.5060605@windriver.com> <20150502081346.GD2366@jama> In-Reply-To: <20150502081346.GD2366@jama> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 02:51:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-05-02 4:13 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:30:24PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto >>>> kernels. >>>> >>>> - We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support >>>> - bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86 >>>> - braswell BSP features and fixes >>>> - Introduction of the 4.1-rc1 -dev kernel (and associated perf fix). >>>> I've built and booted these on my local machines and qemu, and >>>> everything was sane. > > Does it fix the issue I've reported few days ago? > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-April/104344.html Nope. But one config warning is far down on the list when I'm trying to introduce new -stable's and an entire -dev kernel. I didn't forget about it, it'll just get done in priority order. Bruce > >>>> The -dev kernel obviously isn't something for deployment yet, but >>>> it builds, and forms the base for follow up config changes, features >>>> and development work. I built and booted core-image-kernel dev with >>>> the 4.1 changes in place. >>> >>> The autobuilder showed up this for an x32 build :/. >> >> Can one of the intel folks have a look at this ? I won't be able to get >> to it until Tuesday at the earliest. >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x32/builds/282/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Richard >>> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >