From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrosm-0003se-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:40:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrosi-0002vI-3Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:40:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5550BF5B.8020906@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:40:27 +0200 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1431105726-3682-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1431105726-3682-6-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1431105726-3682-6-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/34] block: Use macro for cache option names List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 08.05.2015 19:21, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > --- > blockdev.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > include/block/block.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Any reason for not making it part of the BLOCK_OPT_* macros in block_int.h? Max