From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/15] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 07:50:59 +0100 Message-ID: <555310730200007800079D20@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1431076038-7497-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Feng Wu Cc: Kevin Tian , "keir@xen.org" , "george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Yang Z Zhang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 13.05.15 at 07:11, wrote: > Ping.. I have a list of almost 60 patches to review, among which the ones improving existing code have higher priority than the ones adding new functionality (of course bug fixes come always first), and for the latter series with a rather high version (and without RFC tag) would come before lower version / RFC ones. As said previously (also on the hackathon) - relying on just two or three people doing all the reviewing work (especially when the patch submission rate is as high as it was recently) just can't scale. So by thoroughly reviewing others' patches you can reduce the latency until yours get dealt with (and of course this isn't meant for just you personally, but is a general thing). Apart from that it wasn't even a week ago that this series was posted. Jan