From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:42:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555338A7.5080108@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5537C1A3.8000302@citrix.com>
Ping again.
These should be included in 4.5.1
~Andrew
On 22/04/15 16:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Ping on the patches themselves?
>
> On 13/04/15 17:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 13/04/15 17:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125"):
>>>> gcc 4.1 of CentOS 5.x era does not like the typecheck in min() between
>>>> uint64_t and unsigned long.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
>>>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>>> As and when this is acked and pushed to #staging, we should update the
>>> advisory.
>>>
>>>> This needs backporting to 4.5
>>> To be clear, do you know whether this is a trivial cherry pick ?
>> It is trivial to cherrypick.
>>
>> 4.4 is the problematic case which I did the backport for separately, but
>> then that is trivial to cherrypick back to 4.2
>>
>> ~Andrew
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-13 16:03 [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125 Andrew Cooper
2015-04-13 16:04 ` [PATCH] [XEN-4.4] " Andrew Cooper
2015-06-10 10:33 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-23 10:55 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-23 12:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-23 13:21 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-23 13:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-23 13:44 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-23 14:16 ` Ian Jackson
2015-06-23 14:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-04-13 16:33 ` [PATCH] " Ian Jackson
2015-04-13 16:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-04-22 15:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-05-13 11:42 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-05-21 15:57 ` [PING] [PING] " Andrew Cooper
2015-06-10 10:26 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555338A7.5080108@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.