All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 20:43:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55539B63.2060203@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55537C43.4050606@broadcom.com>

On 05/13/2015 06:30 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
> 
> On 5/13/2015 9:19 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 13 May 2015 at 17:56, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/12/2015 11:27 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> On 12 May 2015 at 23:23, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
>>>>> This driver adds support for the PCIe 2.0 controller found on the bcma
>>>>> bus. This controller can be found on (mostly) all Broadcom BCM470X /
>>>>> BCM5301X ARM SoCs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The driver found in the Broadcom SDK does some more stuff, like setting
>>>>> up some DMA memory areas, chaining MPS and MRRS to 512 and also some
>>>>> PHY changes like "improving" the PCIe jitter and doing some special
>>>>> initializations for the 3rd PCIe port.
>>>>>
>>>>> This was tested on a bcm4708 board with 2 PCIe ports and wireless cards
>>>>> connected to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> PCI_DOMAINS is needed by this driver, because normally there is more
>>>>> than one PCIe controller and without PCI_DOMAINS only the first
>>>>> controller gets registered.
>>>>> This controller gets 6 IRQs, the last one is trigged by all IRQ events.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +static int iproc_pcie_bcma_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
>>>>> +       LIST_HEAD(res);
>>>>> +       struct resource res_mem;
>>>>> +       int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie = devm_kzalloc(&bdev->dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> +       if (!pcie)
>>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->dev = &bdev->dev;
>>>>> +       bcma_set_drvdata(bdev, pcie);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->base = bdev->io_addr;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       res_mem.start = bdev->addr_s[0];
>>>>> +       res_mem.end = bdev->addr_s[0] + SZ_128M - 1;
>>>>> +       res_mem.name = "PCIe MEM space";
>>>>> +       res_mem.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>>>>> +       pci_add_resource(&res, &res_mem);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->resources = &res;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->map_irq = iproc_pcie_bcma_map_irq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       ret = iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
>>>>
>>>> I think I don't like this part of iproc design. It lefts
>>>> pcie->resources pointing to some random memory after the setup/probe
>>>> are done. Guess it should be a separated parameter or sth.
>>>>
>>>> The patch is still OK, I just refer to generic iproc possible issue.
>>>>
>>> Sorry Rafal, but could you please be more specific on this?
>>
>> iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe (and iproc_pcie_bcma_probe) have local "res"
>> variable (each its own). They do:
>> pcie->resources = &res;
>> and then they call
>> iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
>>
>> After iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe / iproc_pcie_bcma_probe returns, the
>> pointer pcie->resources is not valid anymore, yet pcie struct is still
>> in use. Of course pcie->resources isn't used anymore, but still, it's
>> some in-struct pointer (to the random memory since local variable is
>> not accessible anymore).
>>
>> I think you should drop
>> struct list_head *resources;
>> from the struct iproc_pcie and use
>> iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *resources)
>>
> 
> Okay thanks. That makes sense.
> 
> Or I should keep a copy of the resources under pcie->resources. In the
> current pcie-iproc.c, the resource is not used anywhere else except when
> creating the root bus under iproc_pcie_setup. But in the future, I might
> need to add more code to explicitly program the outbound/inbound windows
> so this driver can work with some other iProc SoCs where the desired
> windows do not match power-on-reset values.
> 
> I plan to change this along with the window programming patch in the
> future. I also think Hauke's current patch is fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ray
> 
I think parts of this resources are allocated and never freed.

pci_add_resource() allocates some bytes, but I do not see where they are
freed, this also applies to the platform driver.

Hauke

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: hauke@hauke-m.de (Hauke Mehrtens)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 20:43:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55539B63.2060203@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55537C43.4050606@broadcom.com>

On 05/13/2015 06:30 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
> 
> On 5/13/2015 9:19 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>> On 13 May 2015 at 17:56, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/12/2015 11:27 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
>>>> On 12 May 2015 at 23:23, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
>>>>> This driver adds support for the PCIe 2.0 controller found on the bcma
>>>>> bus. This controller can be found on (mostly) all Broadcom BCM470X /
>>>>> BCM5301X ARM SoCs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The driver found in the Broadcom SDK does some more stuff, like setting
>>>>> up some DMA memory areas, chaining MPS and MRRS to 512 and also some
>>>>> PHY changes like "improving" the PCIe jitter and doing some special
>>>>> initializations for the 3rd PCIe port.
>>>>>
>>>>> This was tested on a bcm4708 board with 2 PCIe ports and wireless cards
>>>>> connected to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> PCI_DOMAINS is needed by this driver, because normally there is more
>>>>> than one PCIe controller and without PCI_DOMAINS only the first
>>>>> controller gets registered.
>>>>> This controller gets 6 IRQs, the last one is trigged by all IRQ events.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +static int iproc_pcie_bcma_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
>>>>> +       LIST_HEAD(res);
>>>>> +       struct resource res_mem;
>>>>> +       int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie = devm_kzalloc(&bdev->dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> +       if (!pcie)
>>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->dev = &bdev->dev;
>>>>> +       bcma_set_drvdata(bdev, pcie);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->base = bdev->io_addr;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       res_mem.start = bdev->addr_s[0];
>>>>> +       res_mem.end = bdev->addr_s[0] + SZ_128M - 1;
>>>>> +       res_mem.name = "PCIe MEM space";
>>>>> +       res_mem.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>>>>> +       pci_add_resource(&res, &res_mem);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->resources = &res;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pcie->map_irq = iproc_pcie_bcma_map_irq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       ret = iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
>>>>
>>>> I think I don't like this part of iproc design. It lefts
>>>> pcie->resources pointing to some random memory after the setup/probe
>>>> are done. Guess it should be a separated parameter or sth.
>>>>
>>>> The patch is still OK, I just refer to generic iproc possible issue.
>>>>
>>> Sorry Rafal, but could you please be more specific on this?
>>
>> iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe (and iproc_pcie_bcma_probe) have local "res"
>> variable (each its own). They do:
>> pcie->resources = &res;
>> and then they call
>> iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
>>
>> After iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe / iproc_pcie_bcma_probe returns, the
>> pointer pcie->resources is not valid anymore, yet pcie struct is still
>> in use. Of course pcie->resources isn't used anymore, but still, it's
>> some in-struct pointer (to the random memory since local variable is
>> not accessible anymore).
>>
>> I think you should drop
>> struct list_head *resources;
>> from the struct iproc_pcie and use
>> iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *resources)
>>
> 
> Okay thanks. That makes sense.
> 
> Or I should keep a copy of the resources under pcie->resources. In the
> current pcie-iproc.c, the resource is not used anywhere else except when
> creating the root bus under iproc_pcie_setup. But in the future, I might
> need to add more code to explicitly program the outbound/inbound windows
> so this driver can work with some other iProc SoCs where the desired
> windows do not match power-on-reset values.
> 
> I plan to change this along with the window programming patch in the
> future. I also think Hauke's current patch is fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ray
> 
I think parts of this resources are allocated and never freed.

pci_add_resource() allocates some bytes, but I do not see where they are
freed, this also applies to the platform driver.

Hauke

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 21:22 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma PCIe 2.0 controller Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:22 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: iproc: make of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() configurable Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 22:14   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:14     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 22:18   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:18     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13  6:27   ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13  6:27     ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 15:56     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 15:56       ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 16:19       ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 16:19         ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 16:30         ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 16:30           ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 18:43           ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2015-05-13 18:43             ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-19 23:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-19 23:14               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-19 23:17               ` Ray Jui
2015-05-19 23:17                 ` Ray Jui
2015-05-20  5:27   ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-20  5:27     ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-12 22:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma PCIe 2.0 controller Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:05   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-20 14:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 14:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55539B63.2060203@hauke-m.de \
    --to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.