From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52195) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YspTL-0006xQ-VV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 05:30:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YspTH-0007ka-Ty for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 05:30:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YspTH-0007iz-Ng for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 05:30:27 -0400 Message-ID: <55546B26.3010101@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:30:14 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1431574469-9605-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1431574469-9605-14-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <20150514043547.GG862@ad.nay.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150514043547.GG862@ad.nay.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] iohandler: Use AioContext internally List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Jason Wang , Vincenzo Maffione , Stefan Hajnoczi , Giuseppe Lettieri , Luigi Rizzo On 14/05/2015 06:35, Fam Zheng wrote: > Sorry, please skip this one for now (overlooked before sending), it's not safe > to include iohandler fds in nested aio_poll, at least until the "device IO" op > blocker patches are in. That's what I was going to ask. :) Still, good job! And for Win32 we could replace qemu_add/del_wait_object with something like aio_set_event_notifier. Paolo