From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:31:10 +0100 Message-ID: <555CD2EE020000780007C69C@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1431893048-5214-1-git-send-email-parth.dixit@linaro.org> <1431893048-5214-2-git-send-email-parth.dixit@linaro.org> <555CBF50020000780007C4C3@mail.emea.novell.com> <555CA675.1080600@citrix.com> <555CC752020000780007C540@mail.emea.novell.com> <555CAD1C.1060203@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <555CAD1C.1060203@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , Parth Dixit Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 20.05.15 at 17:49, wrote: > What about defining a new define HAVE_NUMA? That might be an acceptable compromise. Jan