From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: netlink: Disable insertions/removals during rehash Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:27:13 -0700 Message-ID: <55713331.9040608@roeck-us.net> References: <20150514055824.GB6058@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150515.130257.1322224469755323983.davem@redhat.com> <20150516131628.GA981@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150516.171019.1206903516753105739.davem@davemloft.net> <20150604162727.GA2670@roeck-us.net> <20150605035227.GA527@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:46064 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbbFEF1R (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:27:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150605035227.GA527@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/04/2015 08:52 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:27:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> sorry for bothering you - I don't see this patch in any of your trees, >> and it is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork. Did I look >> at the wrong places, do you still plan to apply the patch as-is, >> or do you expect some changes ? > > I just looked up the patchwork entry and it actually says "not > applicable" which is correct: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/ > > Because the patch only applies to stable and is not needed in either > net or net-next. > Ah, so I was looking at the wrong branch after all. Thanks a lot for the clarification, Guenter