From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-announce] important design choices -
 statistics - ABI
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:13:56 +0200
Message-ID: <55833494.9050804@6wind.com>
References: <9092314.MoyqUJ5VU2@xps13>
 <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D6D24C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8407AC62A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:13:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wilj4 with SMTP id j4so1576523wil.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D6D24C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 18/06/2015 18:55, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> I like Olivier's proposal on using a single option (CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI) to control all of these changes instead of a separate option per patch set (seehttp://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-June/019147.html), so I think we should rework the affected patch sets to use that approach for 2.1.

Do we have any other options to meet the short deadlines of 2.1?