From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:52756 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932139AbbFWJSb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 05:18:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Btrfs progs release 4.1 To: Sjoerd , References: <20150622150023.GX6761@twin.jikos.cz> <7324923.Sa0lmcTP0G@hoefnix> From: Qu Wenruo Message-ID: <55892466.50107@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:18:30 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7324923.Sa0lmcTP0G@hoefnix> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sjoerd wrote on 2015/06/23 11:03 +0200: > On Monday 22 June 2015 17:00:23 David Sterba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load >> of changes. > > Would it be beneficial to update when using older kernels (3.19.x in my case)? Part(most) of. Some one like qgroup limit needs kernel support. UI and offline tools change won't depend on kernel version. But the UI change is most obvious one, so upgrade user-tool should give your a quite fresh feel. > I can't upgrade to kernel 4.1 since my nvidia (propriety) drivers won't > support it (yet) :( Same Nvidia binary driver here, but I just need to wait the kernel and nvidia package enter testing repo of Arch. :) Thanks, Qu > > Cheers, > Sjoerd > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >